Roletter v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Richard Roletter |
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY and ACE INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2022cv00950 |
March 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Reissue Complaint Complaint by Richard Roletter. (GILSON, EDWARD) |
Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmatvive Defenses by GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY.(SLOCUM, GRACE) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by GRACE LIM SLOCUM on behalf of GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY with Jury Demand(SLOCUM, GRACE) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by JEFFREY M. ROSENBAUM on behalf of Richard Roletter(ROSENBAUM, JEFFREY) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by EDWARD J. GILSON, III on behalf of Richard Roletter (GILSON, EDWARD) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by USPS re: served Affidavit of Service Civil Action Summons upon GEICO Insurance by Certified Mail on 3/23/2022 (ROSENBAUM, JEFFREY) |
Summons Issued as to ACE INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY. Forwarded To: Jeffrey M. Rosenbaum on 3/15/22 (fdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richard Roletter ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15784319.), filed by Richard Roletter.(ROSENBAUM, JEFFREY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.