GIBSON v. SOBER et al
Petitioner: DERRICK GIBSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SOBER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Case Number: 2:2022cv00953
Filed: March 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: WENDY BEETLESTONE
Referring Judge: ELIZABETH T HEY
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Filing 5 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by SOBER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Zeigler, Melissa)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 4/5/22. 4/5/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO ATTORNEY GENERAL.(jaa, )
April 5, 2022 MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #3 TO PETITIONER ON 4/5/22. (jaa, )
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; 2. PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND THAT NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; AND 3. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/4/22. 4/4/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PETITIONER.(jaa, )
April 4, 2022 COPY OF PETITION #1 , ORDER #3 AND DOCKET SHEET FORWARDED BY EMAIL TO THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL ON 4/4/22. (jaa, )
March 15, 2022 PRO SE GUIDELINES MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, )
March 14, 2022 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc)
March 11, 2022 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE237907 (sbt)
March 9, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DERRICK GIBSON. (FEE NOT PAID; IFP NOT FILED)(fdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GIBSON v. SOBER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DERRICK GIBSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SOBER
Represented By: Melissa Zeigler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Represented By: Melissa Zeigler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?