CLOUSER v. KIJAKAZI
| KATRINA CLOUSER |
| Acting Comm'r o KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| 2:2022cv00996 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAMELA A CARLOS |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Social Security Magistrate Consent by KATRINA CLOUSER.. (SUTTON, THOMAS) |
| Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (mbh) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 consent)(er) |
| Filing 2 Procedural Order together with Supplemental Orders 3/17/22 Entered and copies e-mailed. (mbh) |
| Summons Issued as to KILOLO KIJAKAZI. E-mailed to counsel on 3/17/22. (mbh) Modified on 4/18/2022 (mbh). (FILED IN ERROR) |
| Summons Issued as to KILOLO KIJAKAZI, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: U.S. Attorney's Office on 3/17/22. (mbh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15790586.), filed by KATRINA CLOUSER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(SUTTON, THOMAS) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/16/2022) (sbt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/16/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
