SADEGHI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| SHARAM AMIR SADEGHI and SHARAM KOHAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2022cv01058 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| KAREN S MARSTON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FILE A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND A COPY OF THE PETITION AND ATTACHED EXHIBITS (DOC. NO. #1 ) IN UNITED STATES V. SADEGHI, 96-CR-0013-1. SADEGHI'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT WILL ADDRESS THE PLEADING IN THE CRIMINAL ACTION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 3/25/22. 3/25/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND US ATTY on 3/24/22 (amas) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number APAEDC-15799806.), filed by SHARAM AMIR SADEGHI. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(PALLEN, DANIEL) Modified on 3/24/2022 (nd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
