MOET v. UNITED STATES MILITARY
| NENNEH SESAY MOET |
| UNITED STATES MILITARY |
| 2:2022cv01062 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Docs. 4 and 5 mailed to plaintiff on 4/14/22. (lisad, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER THAT SESAY IS GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 IN CIVIL ACTION NOS. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, AND 22-1254. THE COMPLAINTS IN CIVIL ACTION NOS. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, AND 22-1254 ARE DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINTS IN CIVIL ACTION NOS. 22-0082, 22-0083, 22-0119, 22-0934, 22-0936, 22-0938, 22-0939, 22-1026, 22-1061, 22-1062, 22-1067, 22-1068, 22-1069, 22-1158, AND 22-1254 ARE DISMISSED FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. SESAY MAY NOT AMEND HER COMPLAINT IN THESE CASES AS AMENDMENT WOULD BE FUTILE. ALL OF SESAYS CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ANY STATE LAW CLAIMS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, WHICH ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO SESAYS RIGHT TO FILE THESE CLAIMS IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE COURT. SESAYS MOTIONS REQUESTING TO SEE THE JUDGE AND OBTAIN A CASH SETTLEMENT (ECF 4, CIV. A. NO. 22-0934); (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-0936); (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-0938); (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-0939); AND (ECF 3, CIV. A. NO. 22-1254) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. IF SESAY FILES ANY MORE GROUNDLESS COMPLAINTS, THE COURT WILL CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATENESS OF AN INJUNCTION BARRING HER FROM FILING NEW CIVIL ACTIONS ON AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS BASIS IN THE FUTURE. THE COURT CERTIFIES THAT ANY APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER IS NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH. SEE 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(A)(3)(A). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THESE CASES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/12/22. 4/13/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/12/22. 4/13/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. (va) |
| PRO SE GUIDELINES MAILED TO MOET (rf, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES MILITARY, filed by NENNEH SESAY MOET.(bw) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by NENNEH SESAY MOET..(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MOET v. UNITED STATES MILITARY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NENNEH SESAY MOET | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES MILITARY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
