DRIGGINS v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
| YESHONDA DRIGGINS |
| PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2022cv01065 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER THAT THE JOINT MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND EXTEND TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (CIV. A. NO. 22-1065, DOC. NO. 13) IS GRANTED. THE MATTERS DOCKETED IN THIS COURT AS DRUMMOND, ET AL. V. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INS. CO., ET AL., CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-4479 AND DRIGGINS V. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INS. CO., CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-1065, ARE HEREBY CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES PURSUANT TO RULE 42(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, ETC. THE DEFENDANTS SHALL HAVE UNTIL JULY 22, 2022 TO FILE RESPONSES TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, COUNTERCLAIMS, AND ANY THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINTS. THE MOTION TO STAY, DISMISS, OR CONSOLIDATE (CIV. A. NO. 22-1065, DOC. NO. 7) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-1065. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE JOINT MOTION FOR AN AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER (CIV. A. NO. 21-4479, DOC. NO. 37) IS GRANTED, AND THE COURTS JANUARY 24, 2022 SCHEDULING ORDER (CIV. A. NO. 21-4479, DOC. NO. 29) IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: THE PARTIES SHALL COMPLETE ALL FACT DISCOVERY BY AUGUST 19, 2022, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/14/22.6/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er)
|
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Extend Time in Which to Respond to Complaint filed by YESHONDA DRIGGINS.Certificate of Service.(JAGHER, JONATHAN) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF (ECF NO. 20), IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A REPLY BRIEF NO LATER THAN JUNE 10, 2022. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/6/22. 6/6/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO TO HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 5/3/22. 5/3/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [ECF 9] IS GRANTED. ACCORDINGLY, PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE THROUGH AND INCLUDING MAY 12, 2022 TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S #7 MOTION TO STAY, DISMISS, OR CONSOLIDATE ACTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 5/2/22. 5/2/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Stay , Dismiss, or Consolidate Action filed by YESHONDA DRIGGINS.Certificate of Service.(JAGHER, JONATHAN) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION to Stay , Dismiss, or Consolidate Action filed by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (DAPPER, ROBERT) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay , Dismiss, or Consolidate Action filed by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(DAPPER, ROBERT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by DANIEL W. INADOMI on behalf of PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY (INADOMI, DANIEL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by LYLE WASHOWICH on behalf of PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY (WASHOWICH, LYLE) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT, PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BY 6/7/22. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 4/11/22. 4/11/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DAPPER, ROBERT) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Erika Cremeans re: served Complaint and Summons upon Ben Ziegler by Personal Service on 03/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (JAGHER, JONATHAN) Modified on 3/30/2022 (tjd). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15801209.), filed by YESHONDA DRIGGINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(JAGHER, JONATHAN) |
| Summons Issued as to PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY. Forwarded To: Jonathan M. Jagher on 3/21/22 (fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DRIGGINS v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: YESHONDA DRIGGINS | |
| Represented By: | JONATHAN M. JAGHER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | DANIEL W. INADOMI |
| Represented By: | LYLE WASHOWICH |
| Represented By: | ROBERT E. DAPPER, JR. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
