SMITH et al v. LM INSURANCE CORPORATION
| KIMBERLY SMITH and NORMAN SMITH |
| LM INSURANCE CORPORATION |
| 2:2022cv01122 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by LM INSURANCE CORPORATION.(WENGER, AARON) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint together with WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by LM INSURANCE CORPORATION.(WENGER, AARON) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by AARON P. WENGER on behalf of LM INSURANCE CORPORATION (WENGER, AARON) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Federal Express re: served Complaint upon LM Insurance Corporation a/k/a Liberty Mutual Insurance Company by Federal Express on 03/31/2022 (MILLER, ROBERT) |
| Summons Issued as to LM INSURANCE CORPORATION. Emailed To: Plaintiff's Counsel on 3/24/22. (va) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LM INSURANCE CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15808620.), filed by KIMBERLY SMITH, NORMAN SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form)(MILLER, ROBERT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
