T BANK v. KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC et al
Plaintiff: T Bank
Defendant: KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC, ROBERT FRANTZ and Sygmus, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv01148
Filed: March 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: BERLE M SCHILLER
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2022 Default Entered (amas)
May 20, 2022 DEFAULT BY ROBERT FRANTZ, KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC, SYGMUS, INC. FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND. (amas)
May 20, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE by T BANK re #6 Request for Default Notice of Service (LOOMIS, GASTON)
May 20, 2022 Filing 6 Request for Default T BANK against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proofs of Service, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Gaston P. Loomis, Esq.)(LOOMIS, GASTON)
April 28, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by T BANK re: Shaina Carney served Summons and Complaint upon All Defendants by E-Mail. All Defendants. (LOOMIS, GASTON)
April 28, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by T BANK re: Dana Cardona served Summons and Complaint upon ROBERT FRANTZ by Hand Delivery/Service. ROBERT FRANTZ served on 4/25/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (LOOMIS, GASTON)
April 26, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by T BANK re: Allison Rathmanner served Summons and Complaint upon SYGMUS, INC. by Hand Delivery/Service. SYGMUS, INC. served on 4/25/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (LOOMIS, GASTON)
April 26, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by T BANK re: Heather Carson served Summons and Complaint upon KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC by Hand Delivery/Service. KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC served on 4/25/2022, answer due 5/16/2022. (LOOMIS, GASTON)
March 28, 2022 Summons Issued as to ROBERT FRANTZ, KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC, SYGMUS, INC.. Forwarded To: PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 3/28/22 (amas)
March 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants , filed by T Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to the Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form)(LOOMIS, GASTON) Modified on 3/25/2022 (lisad, ).
March 25, 2022 Filing Fee for COMPLAINT or NOTICE OF REMOVAL by T Bank. (Filing Fee $402, receipt number APAEDC-15813617). (LOOMIS, GASTON)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: T BANK v. KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: T Bank
Represented By: GASTON P LOOMIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KINETIC CERAMICS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT FRANTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sygmus, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?