THOMPSON et al v. BPS OPCO, INC. et al
| MICHEL THOMPSON and GEORGE HIGGINS |
| BPS OPCO, INC., DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC., BPS OPCO, INC. doing business as BRANDPOINT SERVICES and DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL |
| 2:2022cv01244 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER THAT A fed. r. civ. p. 16 CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 7/14/2022 11:00 AM by Video Conference BEFORE HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE. COUNSEL SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIRED JOINT REPORT OF RULE 26(f) MEETING; AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 5/5/22. 5/5/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THE STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME FILED BY DEFENDANT BPS OPCO, INC., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT BPS OPCO, INC. HAS UNTIL JUNE 16, 2022, TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 5/5/22. 5/5/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC.S (DOLLAR GENERAL) ATTACHED CONSENT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REQUEST IS GRANTED, AND THE DEADLINE FOR DOLLAR GENERAL TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 16, 2022. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 5/5/22. 5/5/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
|
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC.. (bw) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Extension of Time for Dft BPS OPCO, Inc. to Respond to Pls' Complaint by BPS OPCO, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(HACKMAN, RICHARD) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by GEORGE HIGGINS, MICHEL THOMPSON of Consent of Originating Plaintiff GEORGE HIGGINS to Participate in the Action per 29 U.S.C. sec. 216(b) (TOLODZIECKI, MICHELLE) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by RICHARD L. HACKMAN on behalf of BPS OPCO, INC. with Certificate of Service(HACKMAN, RICHARD) |
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 5 HAS BEEN MAILED TO UNREP. (bw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY JOSEF BUENKER #3 for GEORGE HIGGINS,JOSEF BUENKER for MICHEL THOMPSON, TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 4/18/22. 4/18/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO UNREP.(bw) Modified on 4/19/2022 (bw).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by GEORGE HIGGINS, MICHEL THOMPSON of Consent of Originating Plaintiff MICHEL THOMPSON to Participate in the Action per 29 U.S.C. sec. 216(b) (WINEBRAKE, PETER) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Josef Buenker, Esquire by GEORGE HIGGINS, MICHEL THOMPSON. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-15839972.). (TOLODZIECKI, MICHELLE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHELLE TOLODZIECKI on behalf of GEORGE HIGGINS, MICHEL THOMPSON (TOLODZIECKI, MICHELLE) |
| Summons Issued as to BPS OPCO, INC., DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC.. Forwarded To: Peter D. Winebrake on 4/1/22 (fdc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BPS OPCO, INC., DOLGENCORP OF TEXAS, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15827914.), filed by MICHEL THOMPSON, GEORGE HIGGINS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(WINEBRAKE, PETER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
