AARC PROPERTIES LLC v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| AARC PROPERTIES LLC |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MANGUAL DEMOLITION INC and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS |
| 2:2022cv01436 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TO ISSUE SUMMONS by AARC PROPERTIES LLC. (LISMAN, JOHN) |
Filing 5
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL PROPERLY SERVE DEFENDANT MANGUAL DEMOLITION, INC. WITH ITS COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 7/11/22 OR ITS CLAIMS AGAINST MANGUAL WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/6/22. 6/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Skylar Wright re: served Writ of Summons upon Mangual Demolition, Inc. by Personal on 02/04/2022 (LISMAN, JOHN) |
| Filing 3 City ANSWER to Complaint by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.(KANE, DEREK) |
| Filing 2 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (ke) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15853142), filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.(KANE, DEREK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
