SPIVACK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Plaintiff: RACHEL SPIVACK
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Case Number: 2:2022cv01438
Filed: April 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: PAUL S DIAMOND
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (DOC. NO. #7 ); AND DEFENDANTS RESPONSES (DOC. NOS. #18 , #19 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/17/2022. 5/17/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
May 13, 2022 Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order filed by LAWRENCE S. KRASNER. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(SMITH, DAVID)
May 13, 2022 Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G)(KAVULICH, LAURI)
May 12, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by JAKOB F. WILLIAMS on behalf of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with Certificate of Service(WILLIAMS, JAKOB)
May 12, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by LAURI A. KAVULICH on behalf of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with Certificate of Service(KAVULICH, LAURI)
May 10, 2022 Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RACHEL SPIVACK. LAWRENCE S. KRASNER waiver sent on 5/5/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (GOLD, SIDNEY)
May 10, 2022 COPY OF DOC. NO. 14 HAS BEEN MAILED TO COUNSEL. (bw)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NO LATER THAN 5/13/22, AT 5PM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/9/22. 5/9/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas)
May 9, 2022 Filing 13 LETTER TO JUDGE DIAMOND; FROM DAVID SMITH; DATED 5/9/22. (amas)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NO LATER THAN MAY 11, 2022 AT 12 PM.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 5/5/2022. 5/5/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
May 5, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by ANNE E. KANE on behalf of LAWRENCE S. KRASNER (KANE, ANNE)
May 4, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by NICOLE S. MORRIS on behalf of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with Certificate of Service(MORRIS, NICOLE)
May 4, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by SAMANTHA J. BANKS on behalf of LAWRENCE S. KRASNER (BANKS, SAMANTHA)
May 4, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID SMITH on behalf of LAWRENCE S. KRASNER (SMITH, DAVID)
May 4, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order filed by RACHEL SPIVACK.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Certification Under FRCP 65, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Proposed Order)(GOLD, SIDNEY)
May 3, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER. (amas)
May 3, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RACHEL SPIVACK. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA waiver sent on 4/20/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. (GOLD, SIDNEY)
April 29, 2022 MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #4 TO COUNSEL ON 4/29/22. (jaa, )
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF CHRISTINA MARTINEZ, ESQ. IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/27/22. 4/28/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL; E-MAILED.(amas)
April 19, 2022 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/19/2022. 4/19/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
April 18, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Christina Martinez, Esquire by RACHEL SPIVACK. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-15862481.). (GOLD, SIDNEY)
April 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15853506.), filed by RACHEL SPIVACK.(GOLD, SIDNEY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPIVACK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RACHEL SPIVACK
Represented By: SIDNEY L. GOLD
Represented By: CHRISTINA Marie MARTINEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Represented By: JAKOB F. WILLIAMS
Represented By: LAURI A. KAVULICH
Represented By: NICOLE S. MORRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Represented By: DAVID SMITH
Represented By: ANNE E. KANE
Represented By: SAMANTHA J. BANKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?