JOHNSON v. KARIM
| STEPHANIE JOHNSON |
| A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM and ASM R KARIM |
| 2:2022cv01506 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE by A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM.(RUSS, SCOTT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: RULE 16 TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR 6/30/2022 10:30 AM (EASTERN TIME) BEFORE THE HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE III. ADDITIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. CHAMBERS WILL CIRCULATE THE CALL-IN INFORMATION.(cps) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STEPHANIE JOHNSON re: Rapid Delivery Service served Summons and Complaint upon A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM by Personal Service. A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM served on 5/13/2022, answer due 6/3/2022. (SIMON, MARC) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by SCOTT MICHAEL RUSS on behalf of A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM (RUSS, SCOTT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ANTHONY J. CANALE on behalf of STEPHANIE JOHNSON (CANALE, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM. Forwarded To: counsel on 4/19/22 (mbh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A.S.M. REZAUL KARIM ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15865995.), filed by STEPHANIE JOHNSON.(SIMON, MARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
