BOND v. WETZEL et al
| JESSE D. BOND |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 2:2022cv01524 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REQUEST TO THE COURT TO DISREGARD PREVIOUS MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by JESSE D. BOND, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (ENVELOPE ATTACHED). (er) Modified on 6/16/2022 (er). |
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THE COURT'S JUNE 1, 2022 ORDER (DOC. NO. 7) IS VACATED. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (DOC. NO. 10) IS GRANTED, AND THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 6) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS ACTION AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/3/22.6/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE). (er)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL FILED BY JESSE D. BOND. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. ENVELOPE INCLUDED. (mas) (Main Document 10 replaced on 6/8/2022) (mas). |
| Copy of Doc. 11 mailed to Pro Se. (mas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to Plaintiff re #8 Request for Waiver of Service. (er) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to DEFENDANTS on 6/1/22 by JESSE D. BOND. Waiver of Service due by 7/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(er) (Main Document 8 replaced on 6/2/2022) (er). (Main Document 8 replaced on 6/2/2022) (er). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 6) IS GRANTED, AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, ETC. THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 6) IS GRANTED, AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI PHOENIX. THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 2) IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS SPECIALLY APPOINTED TO SERVE WRITTEN WAIVER REQUESTS ON THE DEFENDANTS, PURSUANT TO RULE 4(D) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, TO EFFECT WAIVER OF SERVICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/1/22. 6/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES, FAXED TO WARDEN (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE ).(er) (VACATED PER DOC. 11). Modified on 6/3/2022 (er).
|
| Copy of Doc. 7 mailed to Pro Se and to the Warden. (mas) |
| Filing 6 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY JESSE D. BOND. ENVELOPE INCLUDED. (mas) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE THE APPLICATION DID NOT INCLUDE THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISONERS INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT BALANCE OR A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE ENTIRE SIX-MONTH PERIOD, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/29/22.4/29/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(er)
|
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JESSE D. BOND. (bw) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/21/2022) (lisad, ). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against GEORGE M. LITTLE, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, filed by JESSE D. BOND.(bw) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/21/2022) (lisad, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JESSE D. BOND..(bw) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/21/2022) (lisad, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
