MILLER v. TICE et al
| GARY PAUL MILLER |
| WARDEN MR. TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2022cv01599 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED OUT ENTRY #5 TO PETITIONER ON 5/11/22. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 5 Letter from U.S. District Court EDPA dated 5/10/22 to Gary Paul Miller. Re: Transfer of Case to Western District of PA. (fdc) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/9/22. 5/9/22 ENTERED. COPY OF ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO MILLER BY CHAMBERS. (fdc)
|
| Case Transferred to U.S. District Court Western District of PA via CM/ECF electronic transfer. (fdc) |
| Filing 3 Letter dated 5/5/2022 by GARY PAUL MILLER (sg) Modified on 5/6/2022 (sg). |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by GARY PAUL MILLER. (NO FEE NO IFP) (sg) Modified on 5/5/2022 (sg). (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/5/2022) (lisad, ). Modified on 5/5/2022 (lisad, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
