ROMAN v. NLF INVESTMENTS LLC et al
| ALEXIS ROMAN |
| NLF INVESTMENTS LLC doing business as NATIONAL LAWSUIT FUNDING and CHASE RUBIN |
| 2:2022cv01901 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC. NO. 6 MAILED TO UNREP AND PRO SE ON 5/31/2022. (md) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/26/22. 5/26/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by ALEXIS ROMAN. (SMITH, CATHERINE) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALEXIS ROMAN. NLF INVESTMENTS LLC waiver sent on 5/18/2022, answer due 7/18/2022. (SMITH, CATHERINE) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALEXIS ROMAN. CHASE RUBIN waiver sent on 5/18/2022, answer due 7/18/2022. (SMITH, CATHERINE) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to NLF INVESTMENTS LLC, CHASE RUBIN. (rf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15922812.), filed by ALEXIS ROMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(SMITH, CATHERINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
