MAHONEY v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
| JOHN MAHONEY |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION |
| 2:2022cv01922 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 7/27/2022 at 4:00 PM IN Judge's Chambers BEFORE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER.(sfl) |
Filing 8
ORDER RE: MR. JANSON SHALL HAVE UNTIL JULY 19, 2022, TO REMIT THE $40 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR THE COURT WILL DENY THE MOTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/13/2022. 7/13/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Myra B. Villamor, Esq. filed by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.Affidavit of Eric Janson, Proposed Order, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Eric Janson In Support of Unopposed Motion for Admission, #2 Exhibit A to Affidavit of Eric Janson, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(JANSON, ERIC) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE: THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED TO AUGUST 5, 2022. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/11/2022. 7/11/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)) filed by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.Memorandum, Proposed Order, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(JANSON, ERIC) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.(JANSON, ERIC) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT MUST ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE JULY 8, 2022. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 6/2/2022. 6/2/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl)
|
| Remark COPY OF DOCUMENT #3 MAILED TO DEFENDANT AT 100 VETERANS WAY, WARMINSTER, PA 18974 BY CHAMBERS ON 6/2/2022 (sfl) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 5/18/22 (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15925517.), filed by JOHN MAHONEY.(Glanzberg, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MAHONEY v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN MAHONEY | |
| Represented By: | David Glanzberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | ERIC J. JANSON |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
