MULDOON v. CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA
| ROBERT MULDOON |
| CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2022cv01929 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ROBERT MULDOON. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA waiver sent on 7/14/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. (KOLLER, DAVID) |
Filing 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTION WILL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA IS SUBSTITUTED AS THE PROPER PARTY DEFENDANT IN THIS MATTER, REPLACING CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, WHICH WAS IMPROPERLY NAMED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/14/2022. 7/14/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION to Amend Caption by ROBERT MULDOON. (KOLLER, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 5/18/2022 (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15926848.), filed by ROBERT MULDOON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KOLLER, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
