BACHISM et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
Plaintiff: Hannah Bachism and JOSEPH RUPPRECHT
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and OFFICER MATTHEW SINKIEWICZ
Case Number: 2:2022cv02041
Filed: May 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MARK A KEARNEY
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by HANNAH BACHISM, JOSEPH RUPPRECHT. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY waiver sent on 6/13/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. (HARRIS, GRACE)
July 22, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by HANNAH BACHISM, JOSEPH RUPPRECHT re: Deputy Sean Forsyth served Summons and Complaint upon MATTHEW SINKIEWICZ by Personal Service. MATTHEW SINKIEWICZ served on 7/12/2022, answer due 8/2/2022. (HARRIS, GRACE)
July 19, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by MEGAN K. SHANNON on behalf of SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY (SHANNON, MEGAN)
July 19, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSHUA D. GROFF on behalf of SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY with Certificate of Service(GROFF, JOSHUA)
July 19, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK E. GOTTLIEB on behalf of SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY with JURY DEMAND AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE(GOTTLIEB, MARK)
May 27, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MATTHEW SINKIEWICZ, SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. (rf, )
May 25, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by JONATHAN H. FEINBERG on behalf of Hannah Bachism, JOSEPH RUPPRECHT (FEINBERG, JONATHAN)
May 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15943370.), filed by Hannah Bachism, JOSEPH RUPPRECHT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(HARRIS, GRACE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BACHISM et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hannah Bachism
Represented By: JONATHAN H. FEINBERG
Represented By: GRACE HARRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPH RUPPRECHT
Represented By: JONATHAN H. FEINBERG
Represented By: GRACE HARRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Represented By: MARK E. GOTTLIEB
Represented By: JOSHUA D. GROFF
Represented By: MEGAN K. SHANNON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER MATTHEW SINKIEWICZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?