SCHUCK v. CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
| JAMES SCHUCK |
| PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA,PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2022cv02124 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JAMES SCHUCK. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA waiver sent on 7/14/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. (KOLLER, DAVID) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE STIPULATION TO AMEND CAPTION #3 , IT IS ORDERED THAT THE STIPULATION IS APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CAPTION ON THE DOCKET SHALL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AS THE SOLE DEFENDANT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 7/14/22. 7/14/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION to Amend Caption by JAMES SCHUCK. (KOLLER, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADLEPHIA,PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 6/1/22 (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15953690.), filed by JAMES SCHUCK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KOLLER, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
