DARDEN v. LAMAS et al
| MATTHEW DARDEN |
| MARIOSA LAMAS, KENNETH M. EASON, MS. SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, ALICIA ROSS, DR. PAUL LITTLE, BENJAMIN ROBINSON, SCINNER and MICHEWL |
| 2:2022cv02140 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JUAN R SANCHEZ |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC 4 & PRISONER IFP FORM MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT IF DARDEN SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION, HE MUST WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT, ETC. CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH DARDEN WITH A BLANK COPY OF COURTS CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FOR BEARING CASE NUMBER, ETC. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 6/15/22. 6/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(rf, )
|
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against KENNETH M. EASON, MARIOSA LAMAS, SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, PAUL LITTLE, MICHEWL, BENJAMIN ROBINSON, ALICIA ROSS, SCINNER, filed by MATTHEW DARDEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bw) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MATTHEW DARDEN..(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
