IN RE: FURANDO
JOSEPH FURANDO |
2:2022cv02245 |
June 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Transferred to U.S. District Court for the Middle District of PA via CM/ECF electronic transfer. (fdc) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT AND CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/21/22. 6/22/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO FURANDO.(fdc) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by JOSEPH FURANDO. (No Filing Fee Pd.; No IFP filed) (fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: IN RE: FURANDO | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JOSEPH FURANDO | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.