DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
ZUMAR DUBOSE |
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
2:2022cv02440 |
June 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw) |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE241125 FDC PHILADELPHIA (bw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number PPE241125.), filed by ZUMAR DUBOSE.(bw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DUBOSE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: ZUMAR DUBOSE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.