FUNG v. GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC et al
| DAVONTE FUNG |
| GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC and GET AIR KING OF PRUSSIA INC |
| 2:2022cv02544 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| R BARCLAY SURRICK |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by GET AIR KING OF PRUSSIA INC, GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC.(BIBIKOS, GEORGE) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by GEORGE A. BIBIKOS on behalf of GET AIR KING OF PRUSSIA INC, GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC (BIBIKOS, GEORGE) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by GET AIR KING OF PRUSSIA INC, GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC. All Defendants. (SHERR, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by CHARLENE HEALY, RP re: served COMPLAINT upon GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC. C/O JACOB GOODELL by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED on 07/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(SHERR, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to GET AIR KING OF PRUSSIA INC, GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 6/30/22 (bw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GET AIR KING OF PRUSSIA INC, GET AIR MANAGEMENT INC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16014359.), filed by DAVONTE FUNG.(ONDICH, LISA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
