KING et al v. LOPEZ
ASHLEY KING, BRITTANY DANIEL, ZINAB AKINRINLO and SHAKEESA EDWARDS |
NICHOLAS LOPEZ |
2:2022cv02560 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GENE EK PRATTER |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/14/2022 at 4:00 PM IN Chambers BEFORE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement, #3 Supplement)(sfl) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by NICHOLAS LOPEZ. (MARTIN-LO STRACCO, THERESA) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint together with to plaintiff's complaint by NICHOLAS LOPEZ.(MARTIN-LO STRACCO, THERESA) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF re: served DEFENDANT NICHOLAS LOPEZ upon DEFENDANT NICHOLAS LOPEZ by SHERIFF'S SERVICE on 7/21/22 (BARRIST, ADAM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by THERESA M. MARTIN-LO STRACCO on behalf of NICHOLAS LOPEZ (MARTIN-LO STRACCO, THERESA) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to NICHOLAS LOPEZ. Forwarded To: counsel on 7/1/22 (mbh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NICHOLAS LOPEZ ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16018010.), filed by ASHLEY KING, SHAKEESA EDWARDS, ZINAB AKINRINLO, BRITTANY DANIEL.(BARRIST, ADAM) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/1/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.