KHANTHAN v. CVS HEALTH et al
| SUGANYA KHANTHAN |
| CVS Health individually and d/b/a CVS, CVS, CVS PHARMACY, Sunjay Kolhi, Christopher Bryant, Josie Stewart and CVS HEALTH (INDIVIDUALLY) doing business as CVS |
| 2:2022cv02593 |
| July 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SUGANYA KHANTHAN. CHRISTOPHER BRYANT waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; CVS waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; CVS HEALTH waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; CVS PHARMACY waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; SUNJAY KOLHI waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; JOSIE STEWART waiver sent on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (CARSON, SETH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CHRISTOPHER BRYANT, CVS, CVS HEALTH, CVS PHARMACY, SUNJAY KOLHI, JOSIE STEWART. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 7/5/2022 (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16021404.), filed by SUGANYA KHANTHAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(CARSON, SETH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
