MEINDL v. WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE et al
GAIL MEINDL |
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE and WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. PENSION PLAN |
2:2022cv02710 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by GAIL MEINDL. WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. PENSION PLAN waiver sent on 7/19/2022, answer due 9/19/2022; WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE waiver sent on 7/19/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. (GARNER, MELANIE) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MELANIE J. GARNER on behalf of GAIL MEINDL with Certificate of Service(GARNER, MELANIE) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. PENSION PLAN, WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE. (rf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. PENSION PLAN, WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16039486.), filed by GAIL MEINDL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(GARNER, ADAM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/13/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.