RIDDICK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
OFFICER ERIC RIDDICK |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE PAUL RICH, OFFICER JAMES O'HARA and OFFICERS JOHN DOE(S) |
2:2022cv02825 |
July 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 9/8/22. 9/8/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED TO 9/8/22. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/10/22. 8/10/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. (Zurbriggen, Adam) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Ross Zurbriggen on behalf of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with Certificate of Service(Zurbriggen, Adam) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES O'HARA, PAUL RICH. Forwarded To: EMEKA IGWE on 7/20/22 (fdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16054210.), filed by ERIC RIDDICK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(IGWE, EMEKA) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/20/2022) (sbt). (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/20/2022) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.