DUBOSE et al v. LAPPENS et al
| ZUMAR DUBOSE and ABDUSH DUBOSE |
| DEPUTY USA LOUIS LAPPENS, AUSA J. JEANETTE KANG, AUSA CASSYE COYLE and USPS-OIG ADAM M. GREISS |
| 2:2022cv02835 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSHUA D WOLSON |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT IF PLAINTIFFS SEEK TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, THEN ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 26, 2022, THEY MUST EITHER (A) SUBMIT A SINGLE $402 FEE OR EACH FILE A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF THEIR PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT(S). SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 7/28/22. 7/28/22 ENTERED. COPIES OF THIS ORDER AND PRISONER IFP FORM MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS.(fdc)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ZUMAR DUBOSE. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ZUMAR DUBOSE. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by ZUMAR DUBOSE.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by ZUMAR DUBOSE.(jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CASSYE COYLE, ADAM M. GREISS, J. JEANETTE KANG, LOUIS LAPPENS, filed by ZUMAR DUBOSE, ABDUSH DUBOSE. (FILING FEE NOT PAID; IFP NOT FILED)(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
