HATCHIGIAN v. SKLAR LAW OFFICE et al
| DAVID HATCHIGIAN |
| SKLAR LAW OFFICE, ESQ. KRISTEN A. MORRIS, ABCO REFRIGERATION SUPPLY CORPORATION, ESQ. ROGER FAY and SKLAR LAW, LLC |
| 2:2022cv02866 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND THE CAPTION IS GRANTED AND THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO AMEND THE CAPTION TO REFLECT THE FULL AND PROPER NAME OF DEFENDANT IS SKLAR LAW, LLC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/14/22. 9/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh)
|
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND CAPTION FILED BY DAVID HATCHIGIAN, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Email)(mbh) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION IS GRANTED IN PART. THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR PRE-FILING INJUNCTION IS EXTENDED 20 DAYS. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE A RESPONSE BY 12 PM ON 9/26/22. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 8/29/22.8/29/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh)
|
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S RULE 26(b) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Email)(mbh) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Pre-Filing Injunction filed by ABCO REFRIGERATION SUPPLY CORPORATION, ROGER FAY, KRISTEN A. MORRIS, SKLAR LAW OFFICE.Brief, Declaration. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Attorney Declaration, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT D1, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT D2, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT D3, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT D4, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT D5, #8 Exhibit EXHIBIT D6, #9 Exhibit EXHIBIT D7, #10 Exhibit EXHIBIT D8, #11 Exhibit EXHIBIT D9, #12 Affidavit Cert. of Compliance, #13 Brief Brief, #14 Certificate of Service Cert. of Service)(FAY, ROGER) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 20000786 (jaa, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ABCO REFRIGERATION SUPPLY CORPORATION, ROGER FAY, KRISTEN A. MORRIS, SKLAR LAW OFFICE. EMAILED To: PLAINTIFF on 8/2/22. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 4 Declaration filed by DAVID HATCHIGIAN. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Email)(mbh) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT IF HATCHIGIAN SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER EITHER PAY $402 OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE HATCHIGIAN WITH AN APPROPRIATE NON PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION OF THIS CASE. HATCHIGIAN IS ALSO DIRECTED TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE DECLARATION FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO HATCHIGIAN ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE ATTACHED FORM AND NOTE THE MAILING ON THE DOCKET. NO SUMMONS SHALL ISSUE AT THIS TIME.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 8/1/22. 8/1/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO PRO SE WITH DECLARATION FORM AND IFP FORM.(mbh)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mbh) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against ABCO REFRIGERATION SUPPLY CORPORATION, ROGER FAY, KRISTEN A. MORRIS and SKLAR LAW OFFICE filed by DAVID HATCHIGIAN. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP) (Attachments: #1 Ex 1, #2 Ex 2, #3 Ex 3, #4 Ex 4)(mbh) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DAVID HATCHIGIAN. (fb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
