CLAYTON et al v. ASLAM et al
Plaintiff: Terrence Clayton and Steven Harris
Defendant: Nadia Aslam and MUHAMMAD USMAN ALI
Case Number: 2:2022cv02914
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MARK A KEARNEY
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2022 Filing 8 Alias Summons Issued as to MUHAMMAD USMAN ALI, NADIA ASLAM. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 9/13/22 (bw)
September 13, 2022 Filing 7 Praecipe to Issue Alias Summons filed by TERRENCE CLAYTON, STEVEN HARRIS. (JANCZYK, PETER)
August 5, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by JOSEPH K. THOMAS on behalf of MUHAMMAD USMAN ALI, NADIA ASLAM (THOMAS, JOSEPH)
August 2, 2022 MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #3 TO UNREP ON 8/2/22. (jaa, )
August 1, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to MUHAMMAD USMAN ALI, NADIA ASLAM. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 8/1/22 (bw)
July 31, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by TERRENCE CLAYTON, STEVEN HARRIS.(JANCZYK, PETER)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER PLAINTIFFS SHALL, ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 2, 2022, SHALL: FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT PLEADING OUR LIMITED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR SHOW CAUSE IN A MEMORANDUM NOT EXCEEDING FIVE PAGES AS TO WHY WE ENJOY SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AS PLEAD. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/26/22. 7/26/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO UNREP.(bw) Modified on 8/1/2022 (bw).
July 26, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MUHAMMAD USMAN ALI, NADIA ASLAM. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 7/26/22 (bw)
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16065844.), filed by Terrence Clayton, Steven Harris. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form Designation Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track)(JANCZYK, PETER) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/26/2022) (rg). (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/26/2022) (rg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CLAYTON et al v. ASLAM et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrence Clayton
Represented By: PETER K. JANCZYK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Harris
Represented By: PETER K. JANCZYK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nadia Aslam
Represented By: JOSEPH K. THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MUHAMMAD USMAN ALI
Represented By: JOSEPH K. THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?