SADDI et al v. BLINKEN et al
Ashwani Saddi and Nishant Saddi |
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, CONN SCHRADER, Patricia Lacina, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, UR M. JADDOU, ANTONY BLINKEN and CHRISTOPHER WRAY |
2:2022cv02948 |
July 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (amas) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 7/29/2022. 7/29/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY BLINKEN, UR M. JADDOU, PATRICIA LACINA, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CONN SCHRADER, CHRISTOPHER WRAY. (amas) |
Summons Issued as to RENA BITTER, ANTONY BLINKEN, UR M. JADDOU, PATRICIA LACINA, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CONN SCHRADER, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: US ATTY on 7/28/22 (amas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16071547.), filed by Nishant Saddi, Ashwani Saddi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Exhibit, #5 Certificate of Service)(KAPLAN, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.