SMITH v. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
Petitioner: KEITH ROBERT SMITH
Respondent: SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO
Case Number: 2:2022cv03005
Filed: July 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO
Referring Judge: SCOTT W REID
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2022 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint together with No by DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(MORANO, GERALD)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Order #11 faxed to CCP Chester County. (fdc)
September 15, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by GERALD P. MORANO on behalf of DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY (MORANO, GERALD)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER THAT THE THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER SHALL ENTER ITS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS UPON RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER. THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER TO THE CLAIMS IN MR. SMITH'S HABEAS PETITION AND A SUPPORTING LEGAL MEMORANDUM WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 USC SEC. 2254. ALL OPINIONS OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURTS WILL BE ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS TO THE MEMORANDUM. THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTER SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS, AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. KEITH ROBERT SMITH, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER,CP-15-CR-0002332-2016 WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT W. REID ON 9/15/22. 9/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
September 15, 2022 Petition #1 , Order #11 , and Docket Report E-mailed to PA Attorney General's Office and Chester County D.A.'s Office. (fdc)
August 25, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by GERALD P. MORANO on behalf of DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY (MORANO, GERALD)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Order #9 mailed to Smith. (fdc)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE SCOTT W. REID, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE CHESTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/24/22. 8/25/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(mbh)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER #9 AND HABEAS PETITION EMAILED TO CHESTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. (mbh)
August 23, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Election by KEITH ROBERT SMITH (fdc)
August 19, 2022 Copy of order #6 mailed to pro se Keith Robert Smith (afm)
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by KEITH ROBERT SMITH(jaa, )
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER THAT SMITH IS DIRECTED TO RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER. IF SMITH DID NOT INTEND TO INITIATE A FEDERAL HABEAS PROCEEDING OR IF, AFTER REVIEW OF THIS ORDER, SMITH SHOULD DECIDE NOT TO FURTHER PURSUE THIS ACTION, SMITH MAY FILE A NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A). BEFORE DOING SO, HOWEVER, SMITH IS DIRECTED TO REVIEW THE WARNINGS SET FORTH ABOVE, WHICH EXPLAIN CERTAIN FEATURES OF THE HABEAS STATUTES, INCLUDING THE RELEVANT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. IF SMITH FAILS TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE NOTICE OF ELECTION FORM TO THIS COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, HIS PETITION MAY BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/5/22. 8/5/22 ENTERED AND MAILED TO SMITH.(fdc)
August 2, 2022 COPY OF DOC. NO. 5 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw)
August 1, 2022 Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt)
August 1, 2022 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Western; Case Number 3:22-cv-00099. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER adopting #2 Report and Recommendation. Having conducted a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Kelly's Report & Recommendation and a de novo review of the record in this case, and having considered that no objections to the Report & Recommendation were filed, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record. It is ORDERED that the #2 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and this case shall be TRANSFERRED forthwith to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 7/25/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 8/1/2022.]
June 28, 2022 Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION respectfully recommending that this case be transferred forthwith to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As more fully stated herein. Objections to R&R due by 7/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 6/28/2022. A copy of this document was mailed to Petitioner at his address of record. (dad) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 8/1/2022.]
June 28, 2022 Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer assigned to case. (ijh) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 8/1/2022.]
June 28, 2022 Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan and Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly added. (ijh) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 8/1/2022.]
June 16, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34668005925), filed by KEITH ROBERT SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope) (jd) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 8/1/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KEITH ROBERT SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Represented By: GERALD P. MORANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?