MCGRIFF v. CLOSE, et al.
| RUDOLPH MCGRIFF |
| DAVID CLOSE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2022cv03071 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT CASE IS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE WELLS FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS OUTLINED HEREIN. CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 9/12/22. 9/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
| PETITION (DOC. 1) AND ORDER (DOC. 3) ALONG WITH DOCKET SHEET SENT TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL (rf, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by KARL DAVID SCHWARTZ on behalf of RUDOLPH MCGRIFF with Certificate of Service(SCHWARTZ, KARL) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number APAEDC-16087661.), filed by RUDOLPH MCGRIFF. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Designation Form)(SCHWARTZ, KARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
