OHVA, INC. v. MAGTEK, INC.
| OHVA, INC. |
| MAGTEK, INC. |
| 2:2022cv03628 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT, MAGTEK, INC. IS GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME, UNTIL 12/6/2022, TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 11/3/22. 11/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint (Attorney), #7 Order Setting Answer Deadline to respond to complaint to December 6th by MAGTEK, INC.. (MONZO, ERIC) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT, MAGTEK, INC., IS GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME, UNTIL 11/5/2022, TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 10/7/22. 10/7/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint by MAGTEK, INC.. (MONZO, ERIC) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by OHVA, INC. re: John Shinkowsky served Summons and Complaint upon MAGTEK, INC. by Personal. MAGTEK, INC. served on 9/15/2022, answer due 10/6/2022. (DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to MAGTEK, INC.. (amas) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT COUNSEL CONTEMPLATING FILING A MOTION UNDER FED.R.CIV.P.12(B)(6), (E), OR (F), SHALL FIRST CONTACT OPPOSING COUNSEL TO DISCUSS THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONTEMPLATED MOTION AND TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CURE ANY ALLEGED PLEADING DEFICIENCIES OR STRIKE CERTAIN MATTER. THIS CONFERENCE SHALL TAKE PLACE AT LEAST 7 DAYS BEFORE THE FILING OF THE MOTION, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/13/22. 9/13/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT DESIGNATION FORM by OHVA, INC... (DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file Designation Form in this case using the Exhibit docket event. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MAGTEK, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16164812.), filed by OHVA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Notice of Appearance, #5 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure, #6 Exhibit Patent Report, #7 Exhibit Summons)(DEBRUIN, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: OHVA, INC. v. MAGTEK, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: OHVA, INC. | |
| Represented By: | DAVID WALTER DEBRUIN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MAGTEK, INC. | |
| Represented By: | ERIC JOHN MONZO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
