VAN CROFT v. HORRELL et al
| ERIKA L. VAN CROFT |
| PATRICK C. HORRELL and FARENHOLZ AND HORRELL, PC OF WASHINGTON DC |
| 2:2022cv03822 |
| September 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RETAIN COURT'S JURISDICTION (DOC. NO. #7 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 11/21/22.11/21/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Filing 8 Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Claim re #7 MOTION for Order filed by ERIKA L. VAN CROFT. (Attachments: #1 Email)(nd) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO RETAIN COURTS JURISDICTION, filed by ERIKA L. VAN CROFT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Email) (va) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPEIRD SHALL BE LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE TRANSFEREE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 11/3/22. 11/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| CASE TRANSFERRED TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VIA ECF ELECTRONIC TRANSFER ON 11/3/22. (amas) |
| Filing 5 Declaration by ERIKA L. VAN CROFT. (Attachments: #1 E-MAIL)(amas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ERIKA L. VAN CROFT. (Attachments: #1 E-MAIL)(amas) |
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 3 AND IFP APPLICATION FORM HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF. (bw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT VAN CROFT IS DIRECTED TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE DECLARATION FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER, WITH HER ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO CURE THIS DEFICIENCY WITH THE COMPLAINT. IF VAN CROFT SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, SHE IS FURTHER DIRECTED TO, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO VAN CROFT ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE ATTACHED DECLARATION FORM AND NOTE THE MAILING ON THE DOCKET. NO SUMMONS SHALL ISSUE AT THIS TIME. THE CLERK OF COURT IS ALSO DIRECTED TO PROVIDE VAN CROFT WITH AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER OF THIS CASE. VAN CROFT MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF SHE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF VAN CROFT FAILS TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE ATTACHED DECLARATION FORM WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE WITHIN THE THIRTY-DAY PERIOD, OR IF VAN CROFT FAILS TO (1) PAY $402 (COMPRISING THE $350 FILING FEE AND $52 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHIN THE THIRTY-DAY PERIOD, HER CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 9/30/22. 10/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PLAINTIFF E-MAILED ON 9/27/22. (va) Modified on 9/27/2022 (va). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FARENHOLZ AND HORRELL, PC OF WASHINGTON DC, PATRICK C. HORRELL, filed by ERIKA L. VAN CROFT. FEE NOT PAID. NO IFP. (Attachments: #1 Email)(va) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ERIKA L. VAN CROFT. (va) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
