ZHENG v. MAYORKIS et al
| Chuan Qing Zheng |
| Att'y Gen. U.S. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ALEJANDRO MAYORKIS, UR M. JADDOU, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, MERRICK GARLAND and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2022cv03919 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN R PADOVA |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (sg) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKIS, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND US ATTORNEY on 10/4/2022. ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE EMAILED TO US ATTORNEY. (sg) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT by CHUAN QING ZHENG.. (PIGNONE, MARCO) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED Designation Form in this case using the Exhibit docket event; signature is missing in the Related Case section. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16215327.), filed by Chuan Qing Zheng.(PIGNONE, MARCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
