BROWN v. OFFICER #2356 et al
| Raymond Brown |
| Lt. Brian Crawford, Officer David Alston, Sgt. Kamari Boone, LIEUTENANT CRAWFORD, OFFICER #2356, OFFICER #2661, OFFICER 2049, LT B CRAWFORD, SGT BOONE and ALSTON |
| 2:2022cv04169 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING #14 MOTION TO STAY. PLAINTIFF SHALL RESPOND TO #13 MOTION TO DISMISS BY 12/30/2022. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/30/22. 11/30/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION TO STAY, filed by RAYMOND BROWN.. (Attachments: #1 EMAIL)(sg) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by David Alston, Kamari Boone, CRAWFORD.Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(MAVROUDIS, DIMITRIOS) |
| DOC. NO. 12 MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF (ems) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER THAT in light of Plaintiffs filing of an amended complaint, [ECF11], it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss, [ECF 7], is DENIED, as moot. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/8/2022.11/8/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg) Modified on 11/8/2022 (sg).
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ALSTON, SGT BOONE, LT B CRAWFORD, OFFICER #2356, OFFICER #2661, OFFICER 2049., filed by RAYMOND BROWN.(sg) Modified on 11/9/2022 (sg). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER THAT upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion to amend complaint, [ECF 9], it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket the amended complaint attached to the underlying motion, [ECF 9, pp. 4-6].. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/7/2022.11/8/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT, filed by RAYMOND BROWN..(sg) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by JOE H. TUCKER, JR on behalf of David Alston, Kamari Boone, CRAWFORD with Certificate of Service(TUCKER, JOE) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CRAWFORD, Kamari Boone, David Alston.Memorandum and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(MAVROUDIS, DIMITRIOS) |
| Filing 6 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (sg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by CRAWFORD Case Management Track Designation Form (MAVROUDIS, DIMITRIOS) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by CRAWFORD Designation Form (MAVROUDIS, DIMITRIOS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by CRAWFORD Civil Cover Sheet (MAVROUDIS, DIMITRIOS) |
| Pro Se Guidelines Mailed Out on 10/19/22. (sbt) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Defendant's counsel is directed to file Completed Civil Cover Sheet and Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Brian Crawford, Kamari Boone, David Alston (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16251543), filed by Brian Crawford, Kamari Boone, David Alston. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(MAVROUDIS, DIMITRIOS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
