CYNTHIA PROITE v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION et al
| CYNTHIA PROITE |
| OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION doing business as OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and JOHN DOES, INC. 1-5 |
| 2:2022cv04575 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| SCOTT W REID |
| JOSHUA D WOLSON |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' #11 MOTION FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF ABIGAIL G. WILLIAMS, ESQ. IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 12/14/22.12/14/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Abigail G. Williams ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16370746.) filed by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION.certificate of service.(BOYD, CHRISTINE) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION. (BOYD, CHRISTINE) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT LEAD COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES SHALL APPEAR FOR A VIDEO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 17, 2023 AT 2:00 PM BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON. FURTHER INFORMATION AND DEADLINES AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 11/28/2022. 11/28/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER THAT, ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 5, 2022, DEFENDANT SHALL EITHER (A) FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER, ASSERTING ONLY AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES THAT IT HAS A GOOD FAITH BASIS TO ASSERT, OR (B) SHOW CAUSE, IN A MEMORANDUM NOT TO EXCEED 7 PAGES, WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT STRIKE ALL OF THE ASSERTED AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11(C)(3). SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 11/28/2022. 11/28/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION.(BOYD, CHRISTINE) |
| Filing 6 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (afm) |
| Filing 5 Arbitration Certification that case exceeds the sum of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs or relief other than monetary damages is sought (DILSHEIMER, JAMES) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION (Revised Designation Form) (BOYD, CHRISTINE) |
| Filing 3 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION.(BOYD, CHRISTINE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16315436), filed by OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Form, #4 Designation Form)(BOYD, CHRISTINE) (Attachment 4 replaced on 11/16/2022) (sbt). |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Defendant's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case box needs to be filled out and signed. All Yes/No questions need to be answered. Civil box needs to be checked off. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
