LATIMORE v. TRANSUNION LLC et al
| DANIJHA RAVEN LATIMORE |
| TRANSUNION LLC, EXPERIAN LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
| 2:2022cv04637 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JUAN R SANCHEZ |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT LATTIMORE'S CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 1/4/23. 1/5/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LATIMORE IS DIRECTED TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE DECLARATION FORM ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER, WITH HER ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, TO THE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE THIS ORDER TO CURE THIS DEFICIENCY WITH THE COMPLAINT; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 11/23/22. 11/25/22 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (JL) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN LLC, TRANSUNION LLC, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Filing fee $ 0..) (IFP MOTION PENDING), filed by DANIJHA RAVEN LATIMORE. (Attachments: #1 EMAIL)(JL) |
| Filing 1 DANIJHA RAVEN LATIMORE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS.. (Attachments: #1 EMAIL)(JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
