EMRIT v. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (SDNY)
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT |
| SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (SDNY) |
| 2:2022cv04750 |
| November 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by RONALD SATISH EMRIT. Re: Order that the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed for failure to timely prosecute insofar as appellant failed to pay the requisite fee as directed. (fdc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #9 SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO EMRIT REASSERTING THE MOTION IN THE TRANSFEREE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/21/22.12/21/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 9 SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE BY PRO SE PLAINTIFF RONALD SATISH EMRIT TO HAVE CERTAIN PICTURES ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE. (DT) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re #6 Notice of Appeal filed by RONALD SATISH EMRIT. USCA Case Number 22-3348 (fdc) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #5 MOTION IN LIMINE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO EMRIT REASSERTING THE MOTION IN THE TRANSFEREE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/13/22.12/13/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order by RONALD SATISH EMRIT. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk. (copy e-mailed to pro se) (dt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION IN LIMINE BY PRO SE PLAINTIFF RONALD SATISH EMRIT. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED).(dt) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/7/22. 12/7/22 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Case Transferred to U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York via CM/ECF System. (fdc) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (fdc) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (SDNY), filed by RONALD SATISH EMRIT. (IFP PENDING) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(fdc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by RONALD SATISH EMRIT..(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EMRIT v. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (SDNY) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE IN SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (SDNY) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
