PAYNE v. STONE et al
| DARREN M PAYNE |
| C/O L STONE, C/O THOMAS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT @ C.F.C.F., LT BYNUM, C/O K LEWIS and COMMISSIONER/WARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT |
| 2:2022cv04881 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC 5, 1983 COMPLAINT PACKET, PRISONER IFP PACKET & LOCAL RULES MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER THAT CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND PAYNE COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING: PRISIONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT PACKET, PRISONER MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND COPY OF LOCAL RULES, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/19/22. 12/19/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PAYNE(rf, )
|
| Notice of Pro Se Guidelines #4 mailed to Payne. (fdc) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (rf, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by DARREN M PAYNE., ENVELOPE ATTACHED.(rf, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BYNUM, COMMISSIONER/WARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT, K LEWIS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT @ C.F.C.F., L STONE, THOMAS, filed by DARREN M PAYNE., ENVELOPE ATTACHED *IFP PENDING* (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rf, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DARREN M PAYNE., ENVELOPE ATTACHED.(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
