OWENS v. BRINK'S INCORPORATED
| KENNETH OWENS |
| BRINK'S INCORPORATED |
| 2:2022cv04920 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER APPROVING #1 JOINT STIPULATION FOR ARBITRATION AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION, TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO IMMEDIATELY PROCEED TO BINDING ARBITRATION ON ALL CLAIMS. WE WILL REQUIRE COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE IN MEMORANDA AS TO WHY WE SHOULD NOT VACATE THIS ORDER BY 10/24/23. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE WRITTEN NOTICE OF CLAIM BY 2/14/23. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE JOINT STATUS REPORTS ON 4/24/23 AND EVERY 60 DAYS THEREAFTER. THE CLERK SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN SUSPENSE. ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/24/23. 1/25/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. COPY TO ARB. (va)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #7 Stipulation and Order, by BRINK'S INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(SHER, BRANDON) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE #6 STIPULATION IS NOT APPROVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO EITHER STIPULATE OR MOVE TO STAY THE CASE PENDING ARBITRATION COMPLETED BY AN IDENTIFIED DATE BY ATTACHING A COPY OF THE WRITTEN AGREEMENT CITED BY THE PARTIES SO WE CAN CONFIRM THE SCOPE AND TERMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/23/23. 1/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by BRINK'S INCORPORATED. (SHER, BRANDON) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including The Brink's Company with Certificate of Service by BRINK'S INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SHER, BRANDON) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by BRANDON R. SHER on behalf of BRINK'S INCORPORATED with Certificate of Service (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SHER, BRANDON) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by KENNETH OWENS. BRINK'S INCORPORATED waiver sent on 12/19/2022, answer due 2/17/2023. (MACEY, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BRINK'S INCORPORATED. Forwarded To: Plaintiff's Counsel on 12/12/22 (va) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRINK'S INCORPORATED ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16364838.), filed by KENNETH OWENS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(MACEY, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: OWENS v. BRINK'S INCORPORATED | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KENNETH OWENS | |
| Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER A. MACEY, JR. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BRINK'S INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | BRANDON R. SHER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
