BARROW v. EQUIFAX, INC. et al
Plaintiff: ERIC STEPHON BARROW
Defendant: EQUIFAX, INC. and PRENTICE-HALL CORPORATION SYSTEM
Case Number: 2:2022cv04939
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOEL H SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. 2. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. 3. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II) FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM. 4. BARROW MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST IDENTIFY ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ADDITION TO IDENTIFYING THEM IN THE BODY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SHALL STATE THE BASIS FOR BARROWS CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE A COMPLETE DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT RELY ON THE INITIAL COMPLAINT OR OTHER PAPERS FILED IN THIS CASE TO STATE A CLAIM. WHEN DRAFTING HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT, BARROW SHOULD BE MINDFUL OF THE COURTS REASONS FOR DISMISSING THE CLAIMS IN HIS INITIAL COMPLAINT AS EXPLAINED IN THE COURTS 2 MEMORANDUM. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. 5. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND BARROW A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD FORM TO BE USED BY A SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT FILING A CIVIL ACTION BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. BARROW MAY USE THIS FORM TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT IF HE CHOOSES TO DO SO AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/27/23. 1/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED COMPLAINT FORM TO PLAITNIFF. (jaa, ) Modified on 1/31/2023 (jaa, ).
January 27, 2023 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 1/27/23. 1/30/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
December 14, 2022 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sg)
December 9, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against EQUIFAX, INC., PRENTICE-HALL CORPORATION SYSTEM, filed by ERIC STEPHON BARROW.(sg)
December 9, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ERIC STEPHON BARROW..(sg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARROW v. EQUIFAX, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIC STEPHON BARROW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EQUIFAX, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRENTICE-HALL CORPORATION SYSTEM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?