HENDERSON v. MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS
Plaintiff: KATRINA HENDERSON
Defendant: MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS
Case Number: 2:2022cv04969
Filed: December 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: KELLEY BRISBON HODGE
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16373315.), filed by KATRINA HENDERSON.(KARPF, ARI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HENDERSON v. MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KATRINA HENDERSON
Represented By: ARI RISSON KARPF
Represented By: ADAM C. LEASE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS
Represented By: KRISTEN J. COLEMAN
Represented By: ANGELA ALLEN CRONK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?