KOROMA v. FIDELITY INVESTMENTS
| LAMIN M. KOROMA |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS |
| 2:2022cv05024 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSHUA D WOLSON |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal Voluntary Dismissal of above captioned action filed by Plaintiff against Defendant by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS. (FLEURY, STEPHEN) |
Filing 8
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT FIDELITY INVESTMENTS SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 23, 2023. THE COURT WILL NOT GRANT ANY FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF THIS DEADLINE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL COUNSEL MUST COMPLY WITH JUDGE WOLSON'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE TIMING OF REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS. THE COURT WILL DENY ANY FUTURE UNTIMELY REQUESTS. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 1/11/2023. 1/11/2023 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Second Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS. (FLEURY, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 6 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. (ke) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT FIDELITY INVESTMENTS SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 9, 2023. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 12/21/2022. 12/21/2022 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(ja)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS. (FLEURY, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS re #1 Notice of Removal (Attorney) (FLEURY, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 2 Letter re: Arbitration Certification (Attachments: #1 Arbitration Certification Form)(sbt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16380407), filed by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS.(FLEURY, STEPHEN) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/16/2022) (sbt). |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Defendant's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case section is incomplete. The yes/No questions need to be answered and a signature is needed. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KOROMA v. FIDELITY INVESTMENTS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LAMIN M. KOROMA | |
| Represented By: | EMANUEL A. COKER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FIDELITY INVESTMENTS | |
| Represented By: | STEPHEN J. FLEURY, JR. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
