FORD et al v. KENNEY et al
ANGELA FORD, SHALAYNA SMITH, NEIM BATTLE, NIKKO BATTLE and ELGIN BATTLE, JR |
JOHN KENNEY, DANIELLE OUTLAW and JOHN MCNESBY |
2:2022cv05059 |
December 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THE LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO ADD JOHN MCNESBY AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS CASE. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 1/19/23. 1/19/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS.(fdc) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 1/19/23. 1/19/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. (fdc) |
Notice of Pro Se Guidelines (#3) mailed to Pro Se Plaintiffs. (fdc) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JOHN KENNEY, DANIELLE OUTLAW, filed by ANGELA FORD, NIKKO BATTLE, NEIM BATTLE, SHALAYNA SMITH, ELGIN BATTLE, JR.(sg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ELGIN BATTLE, JR, NEIM BATTLE, NIKKO BATTLE, ANGELA FORD, SHALAYNA SMITH..(sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.