WILLIAMS v. SORBER et al
| SHAWN WILLIAMS |
| JAIME SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2022cv05062 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL FILED BY SHAWN WILLIAMS.(mbh) (Main Document 7 replaced on 2/3/2023) (mbh). |
| DOC. NO. 6 MAILED TO PRO SE WILLIAMS ON 1/30/2023. (md) |
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING #3 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. IF WILLIAMS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $5 TO THE CLERK OF COURTWITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 1/27/23. 1/27/23 ENTERED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| COPY OF DOC. NO. 5 HAS BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope. (va) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope. (va) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope. (va) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SHAWN WILLIAMS. Envelope. (va) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
