SPANN v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| ANTOINE SPANN |
| SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and MICHAEL D. OVERMYER |
| 2:2023cv00237 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN F MURPHY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PLEADING #4 ALONG WITH FORMS MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AFFIDAVIT TO FILE RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT ORDER OF AFFIDAVIT OF A PRIVATE CITIZEN STATUS IS DISMISSED AS PREMATURE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A HABEAS PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. & 2254. A BLANK COPY OF THE COURT'S GENERAL COMPLAINT FORM FOR PRISIONERS TO FILE A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION AND A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN F MURPHY ON 2/14/23.2/14/23 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH FORMS.(JL)
|
| Filing 3 ANTOINE SPANN MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AFFIDAVIT TO FILE RESPONSES TO SUPREME COURT ORDER OF AFFIDAVIT OF A PRIVATE CITIZEN STATUS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE..(JL) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (JL) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 0.), filed by ANTOINE SPANN. (NO IFP MOTION)(JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
