SGRO v. APPLE INC.
DAVID SRGO and DAVID SGRO |
APPLE INC. |
2:2023cv00350 |
January 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HARVEY BARTLE |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE JOINT #6 MOTION TO TRANSFERTO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 2/27/23.2/27/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Case Transferred to U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CA. via CM/ECF system. (fdc) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Transfer filed by APPLE INC... (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(RAIOLA, STEPHEN) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by APPLE INC..(RAIOLA, STEPHEN) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN F. RAIOLA on behalf of APPLE INC. (RAIOLA, STEPHEN) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Douglas Forrest re: served Summons; Complaint; Cover Sheet; D upon Daisy Montenegro by Personal service on registered agent on February 17, 2023 (EICHEL, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to APPLE INC.. Forwarded To: Benjamin J. Eichel on 2/16/23 (fdc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APPLE INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16463058.), filed by DAVID SRGO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(EICHEL, BENJAMIN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.