GRUNINGER v. DeJOY
GRUNINGER BENNETT and BENNETT GRUNINGER |
Postmaster LOUIS DeJOY and LOUIS DeJOY |
2:2023cv00414 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAI N SCOTT |
Civil Rights: Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 ra Rehabilitation Act of 1973 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE DEADLINE TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE EXTENDED BY THIRTY (30) DAYS, FROM APRIL 10, 2023 TO WEDNESDAY, MAY 10, 2023. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAI N. SCOTT ON 3/17/23. 3/17/23 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE TO HONORABLE KAI N. SCOTT FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 2/22/23. 2/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(bw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL PATRICK MURPHY, JR on behalf of BENNETT GRUNINGER with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service(MURPHY, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to LOUIS DeJOY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 2/2/23. SUMMONS E-MAILED TO AUSA ON 2/2/23. (bw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LOUIS DeJOY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16473926.), filed by BENNETT GRUNINGER.(Kramer, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.